‘Freedom Convoy’ trial evidence a Rorschach test for attitudes about protest: expert

• Share on Facebook
• Share on Bluesky
• Share on X
• Copy Link

“All of this video evidence that’s been submitted by both sides support essentially divergent arguments,” said Kempa, an associate professor with the University of Ottawa. 

Crash

Vehicle stolen from P.A. involved in serious crash in Saskatoon, SIRT investigating

6h ago

103 strays since Jan.

LLRIB responds after dangerous dog pack draws concerns in communities

6h ago

public safety

'We have sympathy for this individual': North Battleford church responds after bear spray incident

7h ago

Lich and Barber led a protest convoy to the capital, where demonstrators entrenched themselves for weeks, creating what some protesters described as a “festival-like” atmosphere and several Ottawa politicians and residents called an occupation. 

No one disputes that the protest was disruptive, or that laws were broken over the three weeks protesters blocked intersections around Parliament Hill and nearby residential neighbourhoods. 

“I think the evidence is similar, both from the Crown and from our side in terms of the video evidence, because there’s very little question about what actually took place,” Lich’s lawyer Lawrence Greenspon said last month after the court adjourned for the break. 

“There were demonstrators, who did interfere with the lawful enjoyment of someresidents’ property in the downtown core. And as a result, businesses suffered as well. We’ve admitted that.”

The case hinges on whether Lich and Barber committed any illegal activity, and whether they used their influence in the protest to encourage others to break the law.

Lich and Barber face charges of mischief, obstructing police, and encouraging other protesters to commit mischief and intimidation.

When court resumes Wednesday, presiding Justice Heather Perkins-McVey is expected to rule on whether eight local Ottawa residents will be able to testify, or not. 

The defence argued there is no need to hear from those witnesses, since they had no dealings with Barber or Lich. The witnesses can only share their personal observations during the protest, and the defence has already admitted that illegal behaviour took place. 

The Crown has maintained that it prefers to call its case as it sees fit and wants local witnesses to tell the court how disruption, intimidation and obstructions caused by the protest manifested on the streets.

Kempa said it will be up to the Crown to show the court how all the evidence proves Lich and Barber were in control of the crowds and encouraged them break the law.

“And the threshold in a criminal trial is obviously the highest threshold,” said Kempa.

The Crown is expected to lay out how the evidence supports its theory at the end of the trial.

The trial was initially scheduled to last only 16 days but, with only three days left to go, the Crown seems nowhere near the conclusion of its case. 

Perkins-McVey has been working with the Crown and defence to set aside more dates to complete the trial, but so far none have been scheduled.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 10, 2023.

Laura Osman, The Canadian Press

<!– Photo: 20231009161012-65245f0a8db64f0e47bc44a2jpeg.jpg, Caption:

–>