Frank Stronach’s lawyers argue abuse of process in preparing complainants

“We’re entitled to know if the complainants had newfound memories or whether or not they were guided or probed, whether or not they needed the assistance of the Crown to have gotten to that memory,” she said.

“That’s what we’re missing.”

Crown attorney David Tice argued the defence was able to cross-examine the complainants on what happened during the meetings, and just because they believe they could have done so better with more detailed notes doesn’t mean there was a denial of justice.

There is no requirement to record verbatim, and courts have found it’s enough to give a summary along with any new information, he said.

“The cases don’t say the context of everything that may have been said before, after, et cetera, is what’s required here,” he said.

Stronach, who is 93, pleaded not guilty to 12 charges stemming from alleged incidents that took place decades ago involving seven complainants.

As the trial went on, prosecutors sought to withdraw five charges related to three of the women, then agreed with the defence that Stronach should be found not guilty on all but one of those charges. That left Stronach with seven charges related to four women.

Last week, the judge presiding over the case said she “couldn’t possibly” convict the businessman based on the evidence of one of the remaining complainants, whose testimony she deemed unreliable.

Two of the charges are related to that complainant, who alleged Stronach raped her in the early 1980s.

The abuse of process motion largely focuses on the remaining three complainants.

The defence initially said it would seek a stay of proceedings but last week indicated that was no longer the case, suggesting the alleged abuse of process should instead be considered in weighing the Crown’s evidence.

At the outset of the trial in February, Shemesh said the motion would include allegations that some of the complainants were coached by prosecutors before trial.

On Thursday, the defence lawyer said she believes the Crown elicited new memories from the complainants by asking “probing questions,” which police had not done during their investigation.

“Some of it may have just been innocent questions, but I don’t know that,” she said.

Tice, the Crown attorney, said neither the police officers’ notes nor their testimony supports the argument that prosecutors asked probing questions. “That’s simply not the evidence,” he said.

He also rejected the defence’s argument that evidence had been lost simply because it was not captured.

“There’s nothing lost here,” Tice said.

Superior Court Justice Anne Molloy also drew a distinction between the Crown having evidence then discarding it, and never documenting it in the first place.

Molloy, who is hearing the case without a jury, also noted that Shemesh’s suggestion to have preparatory meetings recorded by audio or video marks a dramatic change from the normal procedure among police forces.

The judge said she hopes to have a verdict when the case returns to court on June 19.

“It’s a very difficult decision to write – this is not simple stuff,” the judge said.

Stronach, the founder of the auto parts manufacturer Magna International, is also set to face trial in nearby Newmarket, Ont., later this year.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published April 9, 2026.

Paola Loriggio, The Canadian Press

by The Canadian Press

Frank Stronach’s lawyers argue abuse of process in preparing complainants

What's Trending