Alberta judges urge respect after Smith said she wants to ‘direct’ them

Provincial court spokesperson Olav Rokne declined to link the statement specifically to the premier. “It is an educational piece aimed at public misunderstandings of the role of the courts and the role of justices,” he said.

In recent months, Smith has made a series of statements criticizing “activist” and “unelected” judges while expressing concerns that courts are undermining the decisions of elected leaders.

On her call-in radio show “Your Province, Your Premier” on Saturday, a caller asked Smith a question about bail laws and whether the government could “write some provincial rules to tune these judges in.”

Smith, in response, told QR Calgary and 880 CHED listeners that she wishes she could “direct” judges.

The caller was specifically referring to the case of Justin Bone, who is on trial for second-degree murder in the 2022 deaths of two men in Edmonton’s Chinatown.

Police have said Bone was released on bail a few days before he allegedly attacked the two men while they were at their respective workplaces. Grievances over bail decisions and rules are not new for Smith.

Smith went on to say that judges “get very, very prickly when you criticize them,” but that the criticism in that case was deserved.

The premier also said she’s trying to work with Ottawa to let her government assist in appointing new Court of King’s Bench justices so “that we start choosing judges in Alberta that reflect the values of how we want them to operate here.”

While the chief justices’ statement doesn’t refer to Smith’s comments, or any specific case, it says they recognize their role is to serve Albertans.

“We do this by upholding our oath of office to decide each case honestly, impartially, and to the best of our ability,” it reads.

“We know that our decisions can profoundly impact the people who come before the courts.”

Sam Blackett, spokesman for the premier’s office, offered a brief response to the judges’ statement.

“While recent court rulings have rightfully led Albertans and Canadians alike to question aspects of our criminal justice system, our government respects the role of each branch of government and supports their independence,” he said.

Opposition NDP Leader Naheed Nenshi, in a joint statement Tuesday with justice critic Irfan Sabir, said the unprecedented statement demonstrates how far the premier and her justice minister have gone to sow mistrust in the justice system.

“Every Albertan should be concerned about this. The rule of law is fundamental to a functioning society, and the cheap attacks, directly from the ‘Trump playbook,’ do not reflect Albertan or Canadian values,” they said.

Last fall, Smith and her United Conservative Party government drew criticism from inside and outside the justice system for legislation that included using the Charter’s notwithstanding clause to help end a provincewide teachers strike.

Smith defended the move at the time and took aim at the courts.

“Unelected judges making decisions, without any oversight, and without having to go to the people to get the democratic endorsement of their view — that’s not democracy,” Smith said. “When elected officials make decisions, that’s democracy.”

The notwithstanding clause was used three more times to shield from legal challenge a trio of laws affecting transgender people. Smith said she believes in parliamentary supremacy.

“We are not going to defer to unelected judges who do not have democratic accountability on their side,” she said during a heated November exchange in question period at the legislature.

Last month, Smith’s government directly faced criticism from a sitting judge, after the government tabled legislation that rendered moot an ongoing court review of a proposed referendum question on Alberta separation.

Justice Colin Feasby was tasked with reviewing the constitutionality of the question. But the day before he issued his decision, the government tabled legislation that would allow those behind the referendum push to apply again while also removing rules that proposed questions be constitutional.

Feasby, who issued his decision regardless, found the question unconstitutional under the old rules. He called the government’s legislation “extraordinary” in that it directly goes against “the stable, predictable and ordered society that the rule of law contemplates, and democracy demands.”

In December, Smith was asked why her government intervened in the legal process, and she said she didn’t want to see “gatekeepers” get in the way of direct democracy.

“Whether it’s the chief electoral officer or the court, they seem to want to approve the (citizen-initiative petitions) they like and hold up the ones they don’t like, and that’s not democracy,” she said.

Smith was publicly reprimanded by the province’s ethics commissioner in 2023. An investigation found the premier undermined democracy and broke conflict-of-interest rules by trying to intervene in a criminal case and pressuring her attorney general to make the case go away.

A report released by Marguerite Trussler, the commissioner at the time, said Smith discussed the case directly with the accused, who was later convicted of mischief in a border blockade to protest COVID-19 pandemic rules.

Trussler said Smith compounded the error — and broke Alberta’s ethics rules — by phoning Tyler Shandro, her justice minister and attorney general at the time, to pressure him to drop the case.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Jan. 27, 2026.

— With files from Fakiha Baig in Edmonton

Jack Farrell and Lisa Johnson, The Canadian Press

by The Canadian Press

Alberta judges urge respect after Smith said she wants to ‘direct’ them

What's Trending