‘Stupid’ law preventing Canada’s re-engagement with Iran: retired envoy

Horak, who retired recently, said one obstacle is standing in the way: the passage in 2012 of Canada’s Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act, which allows victims of terrorism to sue countries that are listed as supporters of terrorism.

Among other things, the law paved the way for last year’s Ontario Court of Appeal ruling that upheld the seizure of US$1.7 billion in private Iranian assets by a group of American plaintiffs whose loved ones were killed in terrorist attacks sponsored by the Iranian regime.

“It was a stupid law. And it’s still a stupid law,” Horak told a meeting of the Canadian International Council in Ottawa this week.

“But we’re stuck with it.”

Horak, who was the Canadian foreign ministry’s director of Middle East relations in 2012, said the three major federal parties supported the law.

Then foreign affairs minister John Baird abruptly announced the Tehran embassy closure in September 2012, accusing Iran of being a state sponsor of terrorism and saying it was for the safety of Canadian diplomats.

Though he cited the attack on the British embassy in Tehran 10 months earlier that saw an angry mob storm the diplomatic compound, Baird and the Conservative government declined to say whether Canadian diplomats faced any imminent threat.

“Lost in all of the information about the reasons why, was the real reason … It was the Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act, frankly. That’s the reason; that still exists,” Horak said.

“It’s no coincidence that we closed the embassy basically the day after the legislation became effective.”

After the attack on the British embassy, the Canadian government realized it had “very poor security” around its own compound, Horak said, suggesting that would leave it vulnerable to an Iranian mob.

“The British weren’t even seizing Iranian government property. This law called for the seizure of Iranian government properties,” said Horak, adding the Iranians “have a very flexible view on diplomatic immunity.”

“How could we possibly stay open under those conditions?” he asked. “How can we reopen under those conditions?”

Freeland’s office did not respond to questions about the status of diplomatic talks with Iran.

Horak has already criticized Freeland for her August tweet calling for the release of imprisoned activists, which led the Saudi regime to declare Horak persona non grata, recall Saudi university students from Canada, and cancel flights between the countries. Horak said the tweet was “ill advised” but Saudi Arabia overreacted in response.

Michael Grant, who recently returned to Ottawa after a posting as one of Canada’s ambassadors to the United Nations in New York, said Horak was one of Canada’s top analysts of Middle East affairs. He said Horak’s diplomatic dispatches will add greatly to the country’s understanding of the region when they are declassified in the coming decades.

In his speech to the council, Horak cited the conflict between Sunni Saudi Arabia and Shiite Iran as the core conflict shaping the geopolitics of the Middle East.

His presentation underscored the fact that Canada is now diplomatically hamstrung in both countries — it has no ambassador to lead its embassy in Riyadh while its mission in Tehran remains shuttered.

“How can you have a dialogue when you don’t have ambassadors?” asked retired diplomat John Noble, who was part of the sold-out crowd that turned out for Horak.

Still, Noble said Canada has not traditionally played a major role in the Middle East even though Lester Pearson won a Nobel Peace Prize in the 1950s for helping defuse the Suez Crisis.

“He was trying to prevent a break-up of the Commonwealth and of NATO,” said Noble, who held ambassadorships in Greece and Switzerland.

“The idea that we had a big role in the Middle East has always been over-inflated.”

Mike Blanchfield, The Canadian Press

by Canadian Press

‘Stupid’ law preventing Canada’s re-engagement with Iran: retired envoy

What's Trending