Make Sure Your Electronic Medical Records are Accurate
A solid, dependable patient-doctor relationship sure makes good health easier. Study after study shows that when patients trust and are comfortable with their doctors, it has measurable health benefits. Not only are YOU inclined to share more information with your docs, it also makes a difference in how you respond to treatment — improving your compliance with prescribed therapies and boosting your healing and recovery!
That’s why it is so important that your medical records — especially now that they are electronic and shared among many docs — are accurate. You expect them to contain all your basic vital info (height, weight, age, blood pressure, various cholesterol levels, glucose, some hormone and inflammation markers, and perhaps levels of some key nutrients, like vitamin D, B-12 and an omega-3 index). But you should expect your electronic medical record to contain much more: information about your symptoms, lifestyle, the medications and supplements you take, past and present reactions to medication, and your concerns and even objections. After all, it takes a full range of data, when passed from your primary-care doc to a specialist, for that specialist to understand your baseline —
and build your specialized diagnosis and treatment. If that’s not done, chances are you won’t be as happy with the treatment process — or even the outcome — as you should be.
Unfortunately, a couple of recent studies reveal that EMRs are not meeting those expectations. A 2014 study in the journal Plastic Surgery found that in a sampling of Canadian plastic surgeons, almost 25 percent of the information fields on EMRs was incomplete, and 1.4 percent was inaccurate — especially about current medications, medical history and medical allergies. And a brand new study from the University of Michigan’s Kellogg Eye Center found that the symptoms and info patients entered on their pre-examination questionnaire and the information put into their EMR after talking with the doctor contained what the researchers called “notable differences”!
Looking at the records of 162 patients, the researchers found agreement between the pre-exam questionnaire and EMR for only 38 of the patients! One example, among patients who had noted concern about glare (that’s a big deal when it comes to identifying cataracts and other eye problems), 91 percent didn’t have mention of it on their EMR. The cause for the omission wasn’t clear. Was there a discussion but the info was never inserted into the EMR? Or did the patient forget to mention glare to the doctor, since it had already been mentioned on the questionnaire?